Parties are strongly encouraged to use caution when using artificial intelligence (AI). The use of AI in litigation carries significant risks.  Although AI can be a helpful tool, it is not always accurate. There have been several instances, particularly in the realm of legal writing and research, where AI has entirely fabricated cases and their holdings or representations.  Parties are personally responsible for verifying the accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness of their filings—including the use of AI generative content. The failure to review and verify accuracy may result in sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Those sanctions could include a monetary penalty, or if appropriate, dismissal of your lawsuit.

FAQs Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI):

Can I use AI to help me with my legal proceedings?

At this time, it is not prohibited for litigants to use AI to assist them in their legal proceedings. However, the Court encourages litigants to use AI with extreme caution.  As a reminder, all litigants are personally responsible for verifying the accuracy of the AI generated material, including quotations, citations, paraphrased assertions, and legal analysis, before submitting it to the Court. The failure to read, review and ensure accuracy could result in sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. You would need to take steps to correct any errors introduced by your use of AI tools.

Do I have to disclose my use of AI to the Court?

The Southern District of Iowa does not currently require disclosure regarding the use of AI in court filings. However, the Court could require disclosure via a Court Order should the use of AI become a problem in a specific case.

May a person who is not a licensed attorney provide legal advice or representation to me?

While individuals can represent themselves (pro se) in court, nonlawyers cannot represent other people. Nonlawyers are strictly prohibited from the practice of law and representing others in federal court.